Countries
Global implementation of the EITI Standard
More than 50 countries have committed to strengthening transparency and accountability of their extractive sector management by implementing the EITI Standard.
Countries are assessed on their progress in meeting the requirements of the EITI Standard through Validation, the EITI's quality assurance mechanism. Country-level data on extractive sector production, revenue and management is available on country pages.
EITI implementing countries
-
Albania
-
Angola
-
Argentina
-
Armenia
-
Burkina Faso
-
Cameroon
Suspended for inadequate stakeholder engagement
-
Central African Republic
Suspended for inadequate stakeholder engagement
-
Chad
-
Colombia
-
Côte d'Ivoire
-
Democratic Republic of the Congo
-
Dominican Republic
-
Ecuador
-
Ethiopia
Suspended for missing reporting deadline
-
Gabon
-
Germany
-
Ghana
-
Guatemala
Suspended for lack of progress
-
Guinea
-
Guyana
-
Honduras
Suspended for inadequate stakeholder engagement
-
Indonesia
-
Iraq
-
Kazakhstan
-
Kyrgyz Republic
-
Liberia
-
Madagascar
-
Malawi
-
Mali
-
Mauritania
-
Mexico
Suspended for inadequate stakeholder engagement
-
Mongolia
-
Mozambique
-
Netherlands
-
Niger
Under enhanced scrutiny
-
Nigeria
-
Norway
-
Papua New Guinea
-
Peru
-
Philippines
-
Republic of the Congo
-
Senegal
-
Seychelles
-
Sierra Leone
-
Suriname
Suspended for missing reporting deadline
-
São Tomé and Príncipe
Suspended
-
Tajikistan
-
Tanzania
-
Timor-Leste
-
Togo
-
Trinidad and Tobago
-
Uganda
-
Ukraine
-
United Kingdom
-
Zambia
COUNTRY | STATUS | VALIDATION OUTCOME |
---|---|---|
Albania
|
Moderate
|
|
Angola
|
Yet to be assessed
|
|
Argentina
|
Moderate
|
|
Armenia
|
High
|
|
Burkina Faso
|
Moderate
|
|
Cameroon
|
Suspended for inadequate stakeholder engagement |
Fairly low
|
Central African Republic
|
Suspended for inadequate stakeholder engagement |
Low
|
Chad
|
Fairly low
|
|
Colombia
|
Moderate
|
|
Côte d'Ivoire
|
Moderate
|
|
Democratic Republic of the Congo
|
High
|
|
Dominican Republic
|
Moderate
|
|
Ecuador
|
Yet to be assessed
|
|
Ethiopia
|
Suspended for missing reporting deadline |
Meaningful progress
|
Gabon
|
Yet to be assessed
|
|
Germany
|
High
|
|
Ghana
|
Moderate
|
|
Guatemala
|
Suspended for lack of progress |
Inadequate progress
|
Guinea
|
High
|
|
Guyana
|
Fairly low
|
|
Honduras
|
Suspended for inadequate stakeholder engagement |
Meaningful progress
|
Indonesia
|
Fairly low
|
|
Iraq
|
Meaningful progress
|
|
Kazakhstan
|
Meaningful progress
|
|
Kyrgyz Republic
|
Fairly low
|
|
Liberia
|
Moderate
|
|
Madagascar
|
Fairly low
|
|
Malawi
|
Moderate
|
|
Mali
|
Fairly low
|
|
Mauritania
|
Moderate
|
|
Mexico
|
Suspended for inadequate stakeholder engagement |
Low
|
Mongolia
|
Moderate
|
|
Mozambique
|
Moderate
|
|
Netherlands
|
Fairly low
|
|
Niger
|
Under enhanced scrutiny |
Yet to be assessed
|
Nigeria
|
Moderate
|
|
Norway
|
High
|
|
Papua New Guinea
|
Moderate
|
|
Peru
|
Meaningful progress
|
|
Philippines
|
Moderate
|
|
Republic of the Congo
|
Moderate
|
|
Senegal
|
Very high
|
|
Seychelles
|
Meaningful progress
|
|
Sierra Leone
|
High
|
|
Suriname
|
Suspended for missing reporting deadline |
Fairly low
|
São Tomé and Príncipe
|
Suspended |
Meaningful progress
|
Tajikistan
|
Meaningful progress
|
|
Tanzania
|
Moderate
|
|
Timor-Leste
|
Fairly low
|
|
Togo
|
Meaningful progress
|
|
Trinidad and Tobago
|
High
|
|
Uganda
|
Moderate
|
|
Ukraine
|
Meaningful progress
|
|
United Kingdom
|
High
|
|
Zambia
|
High
|
Delisted countries
Countries that previously implemented the EITI but withdrew or were delisted: Afghanistan, Azerbaijan, Equatorial Guinea, Myanmar, Solomon Islands, United States and Yemen.
Country outreach
The EITI actively engages with resource-rich countries that are not yet implementing the EITI Standard but have shown interest in doing so. Our outreach activities aim to promote transparency and accountability in natural resource management in countries such as Brazil, Chile, Namibia and South Africa, among others. These initiatives are guided by the EITI's Outreach and Candidature Committee, in accordance with the EITI's outreach strategy. Through these efforts, we support countries in their journey towards improved governance and sustainable development of their natural resources.
Suspension and delisting
Implementing countries may be temporarily suspended from the EITI if they fail to meet reporting deadlines; if they make inadequate progress on EITI implementation; or if they fail to meet the EITI’s requirements on stakeholder engagement.
A country may also be suspended in cases where political instability or conflict manifestly prevents the country from adhering to a significant aspect of EITI implementation. The EITI Board may place a country under enhanced scrutiny as preliminary step before considering suspension.
Delisting involves revoking a country’s status as an EITI implementing country. Delisting will occur if a country has been subject to suspension and where the reason for suspension has not been resolved. It may also occur if a country has repeatedly failed to demonstrate progress.
The grounds for suspension and delisting are stipulated in Section 1 (“EITI Board oversight of EITI implementation”) of Part 2 of the EITI Standard.