Contract transparency

Revealing the terms under which resources are extracted

Contracts, licenses and associated agreements are crucial parts of the legal framework which establish the rights, terms and obligations governing the exploration and production of oil, gas and minerals.

As contracts are legal documents that governments enter into on behalf its people, contract transparency enables citizens to understand and monitor compliance with the terms, obligations and payments arising from the extractive projects in their countries. This helps curb corruption because it empowers citizens to assess whether contractual obligations have been breached and who should be held accountable.

Contract disclosure further allows comparison of different contracts across jurisdictions, resulting in a more level playing field and enabling governments to negotiate for better deals.

  • 31
    EITI countries have disclosed at least some contracts
  • 900 +
    contracts have been published by EITI countries
  • 16
    companies support contract transparency

What the EITI requires of its member countries

Contract transparency under the EITI Standard means the disclosure of the full text of any contract, license, concession, production-sharing agreement or other agreement granted by, or entered into by, the government which provides the terms attached to the exploitation of oil, gas and mineral resources. The disclosure includes the full text of any annex, addendum or rider which establishes details relevant to the exploitation rights or the execution thereof, as well as the full text of any alteration or amendment to these documents.

Requirements of the 2019 EITI Standard

Under the 2019 EITI Standard, implementing countries are required to:

  • Disclose any contracts and licenses that are granted, entered into or amended after 1 January 2021.

  • Document the government’s policy on disclosure of contracts and licenses that govern the exploration and exploitation of oil, gas and minerals. This includes:

    • A description of whether legislation or government policy requires or prohibits disclosure of contracts and licenses

    • Explanation for deviation from policy, if any

    • An explanation of where the government policy is embodied

    • Documentation of the multi-stakeholder group’s discussion on what constitutes government policy on contract disclosures.

    • Reforms relevant to the disclosure of contracts and licenses planned or underway

    • An overview of which contracts and licenses are publicly available including a list of all active contracts and licenses with corresponding links

    • Explanation of legal or practical barriers where contracts cannot be published

Implementing countries are encouraged to publicly disclose any contracts and licenses that provide the terms attached to the exploitation of oil, gas and minerals (entered into before 2021).

The multi-stakeholder group is expected to agree and publish a plan for disclosing contracts with a clear time frame for implementation and addressing any barriers to comprehensive disclosure. This plan will be integrated into work plans covering 2020 onwards.

Major companies have signified support, and civil society organisations have stepped up their efforts on this agenda. The introduction of EITI’s requirements on contract disclosure is expected to further improve the management of mining oil and gas sectors as citizens gain more access to information on deals governing these sectors.

“We believe that the only way for a level playing field to be guaranteed is for governments to disclose contracts (and to do so in a systematic way), either through an EITI requirement or through government regulation.”
Tom Butler, CEO, International Council on Mining and Metals

Benefits of contract transparency

The call for contract transparency is particularly pressing in countries where most of the terms and conditions are negotiated. Contract disclosure can help reduce information asymmetry and create the level playing field as all actors know the terms that apply, improve inter-agency collaboration and prompt enforcement of contractual obligations, and increase the perceived legitimacy of contracts which could ensure more stability of investments and reduce calls for revisions of terms.

Although there continues to be some concern that contract transparency could harm commercial competitiveness, contract disclosure practices show that commercially sensitive data (e.g. seismic data, samples, well logs, geological structure maps, use of certain technologies etc.) do not tend to appear in the contract itself but rather stem from the implementation of the contract. Where there are justifiable concerns that commercially sensitive data is contained in a contract, this could be resolved through redaction.

Main benefits of contract transparency:

  • Better monitoring of the implementation of contractual obligation and of consistency between contractual obligations and the overall legal framework.

  • Strengthened inter-agency collaboration, especially where multiple government agencies are involved in collecting taxes and administering the fiscal regime.

  • Help ensure proper government monitoring and enforcement of terms that are specific to individual contracts, in particular in countries where there is weak institutional capacity.

  • Contracts often contain terms and obligations that could be relevant for the local communities where the extractive activities take place. Civil society has found access to contracts helpful in monitoring such impacts.

Regional highlights and good case practices


Many African countries have taken the lead on contract transparency with eight governments endorsing contract disclosure, including Republic of the Congo, Chad, Ghana, Guinea, DRC, Liberia, Malawi and Senegal. Some countries, such as Mali are also proactively publishing contracts, even though the government has not formalized a disclosure policy.

Ten EITI member countries – Chad, DRC, Guinea, Liberia, Malawi, Mali, São Tomé and Príncipe, Senegal, Sierra Leone and Togo – have adopted and implemented policies of full disclosure.  Most contracts are publicly accessible online. In Cameroon, civil society contributed to the publication of the model petroleum sharing contract on the website of Société Nationale des Hydrocarbures, a state-owned company, and helped pass a new law in July 2018 mandating contract transparency. In Ghana and Malawi, civil society efforts culminated in the publication of all contracts through online portals.

Asia and Eurasia

Contract transparency is gaining traction in Asia and Eurasia, with contracts being published in Albania, Armenia, Kyrgyzstan, Mongolia, the Philippines and Timor Leste.  Mongolia had published extractive contracts with local communities which could improve debates on resource governance at the local level. In the Philippines, the civil society organization involved in the multi-stakeholder group (Bantay Kita) has helped local communities and indigenous peoples understand and evaluate mining contracts. This has empowered stakeholders in mining areas to monitor companies’ compliance with contractual obligations and has informed discussions on local development projects.


In Germany, mineral or petroleum rights are not awarded through contracts, but through a licensing process directed by law. Approvals of license applications include the conditions related to the license and are made public if the project in question requires an environmental impact assessment. In the UK, the Oil and Gas Authority website provides access to the full text of all oil and gas licenses.

Latin America

Many countries from Latin America and the Caribbean have legal basis for contract disclosure through laws allowing access to information. This includes countries such as Colombia, Dominican Republic, Guatemala and Honduras. Other countries, like Peru, have portals that make oil and gas contracts publicly available. Mexico, through its National Hydrocarbons Commission (CNH) has created a portal that not only makes oil and gas contracts available, but it also allows users to see the changes within the contract’s lifetime. Guyana has published some petroleum agreements online.

Legislating contract disclosure in countries

EITI processes are helping countries advance contract disclosure in many ways, including in sector-wide legislation. Ten years ago, only nine member countries had a law requiring the publication of oil, gas or mining contracts. Now, 24 countries have such laws.


The contract for the most important mine in the country—the Oyu Tolgoi copper mine—states in clause 15.21 that “This Agreement shall be made public.” The government has published both the original 2009 contract and the 2015 contract amendment.


The petroleum contracts state: “The Ministry shall have the right to keep a copy of this Contract in the Hydrocarbons Register, publish and keep publicly available and distribute to provincial offices such information and reports on the Contract, related documents and the Contractor as is required pursuant to the Hydrocarbons Law….” These contracts have been published by the Government.

Dominican Republic

Dominican Republic promulgated legislation requiring that all acts and activities of the “Public Administration” be made public. This has included public contracts, such as mining contracts. 


Mexico has a more targeted legislation focusing on disclosure of oil and gas site assignments to the state-owned company Pemex as well as contract allocations to private investors in the hydrocarbon sector.

Publication of contracts is technologically simple and not labor intensive.

Public contracts are only truly “public” if they are easy to find, browse, search and use. If governments do not seek to improve access in these ways, increased disclosure can actually obscure information, which makes finding the information about the extractive industries more difficult rather than easier. A few EITI countries publish extractive contracts either through government platforms (Armenia, Ghana, Mexico) or through a dedicated contracts portal (Ghana, Philippines). Some have published contracts through company websites (e.g. BP, Kosmos, Tullow).

Public sources of contracts

Global contract repositories. and the Open Oil Repository contain hundreds of full-text contracts and other associated document that are in the public realm. It is possible to browse by country to see a list of contracts that the repositories contain for different countries.

Company websites. Some companies publish their contracts on their company websites, for example Turquoise Hill Resources in Mongolia, Tullow Oil in Ghana, and Kosmos Energy Worldwide. Check project pages, investment brochures and presentation packages, and transparency portals if available.

Stock exchange filings. Many companies include contracts in stock exchange filings, particularly those filing with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission or the Canadian Securities Administrators. Both these sites include search capabilities. Alternatively, Open Oil’s Aleph Search Engine allows you to search public domain documents filed by oil & gas and mining companies to financial regulators around the world. Over 2 million documents are currently indexed and are searchable and more are added on a daily basis.

IFC and EBRD-financed projects. The International Finance Corporation (IFC) require all IFC-financed exploitation projects since 2013 to disclose their primary contract outlining the terms of extraction. The European Bank for Reconstruction and Development have a similar policy for hydrocarbon projects since 2014. It is important to check whether IFC or EBRD financed projects have released contracts.