Guidance note 1 - Requirement 1
EITI Sign-up: Steps for becoming an EITI candidate country
How to sign-up to the EITI is laid out in Part I, section 2 of the EITI Standard.
A country intending to implement the EITI is required to undertake five sign-up steps before applying. They relate to:
When the country has completed the sign-up steps and wishes to be recognised as an EITI candidate, the government, with the support of the multi-stakeholder group, should submit an EITI candidature application, using the prescribed application form.
The application should describe the activities undertaken to date and provide evidence demonstrating that each of the sign-up steps have been completed. The application should include contact details for government, civil society and private sector stakeholders involved in the EITI.
The EITI Board will review the application and assess whether the sign-up steps have been properly completed.
The International Secretariat will contact stakeholders at the national level to ascertain their views on the sign-up process, and seek comments from supporting governments, international civil society groups, supporting companies, supporting organisations and investors. The International Secretariat will work closely with the senior individual appointed by the government to lead on EITI implementation in order to clarify any outstanding issues.
Based on this, and any other available information, the EITI Board’s Outreach and Candidature Committee will make a recommendation, within a reasonable time period, to the EITI Board on whether a country’s application should be accepted. The EITI Board will make the final decision.
The EITI Board prefers to make decisions on admitting an EITI candidate country during EITI Board meetings. Where there is a long period between meetings, the EITI Board may consider taking a decision via Board circular.
When the EITI Board admits an EITI candidate, it will also establish deadlines for publishing the first EITI Report and undertaking Validation.
An implementing country’s first EITI Report must be published within 18 months from the date that the country was admitted as an EITI candidate. EITI candidate countries will be required to commence Validation within two and a half years of becoming an EITI candidate.
Further information on deadline policies is available in provision 8.
A prospective candidate country may face exceptional circumstances that would necessitate deviation from the EITI’s implementation requirements. In that case, the multi-stakeholder group can apply to the EITI Board for adapted implementation.
Find more information in the guidance note for sign-up.
Implementation is funded by the countries themselves. The way it is funded differs from country to country. In many cases, financial support is provided by international development agencies. For example, the World Bank administers a lot of donor support through its EGPS Multi-Donor facility.
In addition, a number of regional development banks, UNDP, the European Commission, and biliateral aid agencies have provided technical and financial support.
In some cases, companies have provided support for the implementation of the EITI. The EITI has a guidance note on this topic.
Implementing countries are required to make a financial contribution of USD 10,000 to the International Management (Secretariat and Board) of the EITI per year to help cover some of the support that they get from the international body.
The EITI (Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative) is the global standard for the good governance of oil, gas and mineral resources.
It requires disclosure around how licences are allocated, who owns them, the legal, fiscal and contractual framework, production, state-ownership, payments to governments, and allocation of the revenue. It is implemented by countries and overseen in each country by a committee of representatives from governments, companies and civil society.
The EITI is established as a non-profit association under Norwegian law. It is registered as “The Association for the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative” or “EITI Association”. See also the articles of association.
The EITI Standard is the set of requirements countries have to comply with once they have been admitted as an EITI implementing country. Learn more here.
When a country has completed the sign-up steps, the government can submit an EITI candidate application, endorsed by the national multi-stakeholder group, to the EITI Board. The application should describe the activities undertaken to date and provide evidence demonstrating that each of the sign-up steps have been completed. The application should include contact details for government, civil society and private sector stakeholders involved in the preparations for implementing the EITI.
Once submitted, the application will be made publicly available on the EITI website. The EITI Board, working through the Outreach and Candidature Committee, will review the application and assess whether the sign-up steps have been completed. The International Secretariat will work closely with the government and other stakeholders to clarify any outstanding issues. Based on this and any other available information, the EITI Board will take a decision.
A country should only implement the EITI if it is useful. The process may be useful even in countries that do not have significant revenues from extractive resources.
For example, the EITI might establish a valuable forum for dialogue about areas of potential concern in the sector such as establishing the process for allocating licences, setting tax and royalty levels and the legal framework. Some countries have decided to implement the EITI Standard to demonstrate international or regional leadership and/or to persuade others to follow.
Many countries use the EITI to publicly verify that company and government accounting and auditing systems are working efficiently and effectively. The EITI is also used to highlight opportunities to reform and strengthen these systems. The EITI is not just about transparency, it is also about accountability. By establishing a multi-stakeholder platform and informing public debate, the EITI can improve dialogue and trust between all key parties, especially on areas of contention.
The European Union has passed legislation that requires that all companies listed in the EU disclose their payments to governments in all countries where they operate. Canada and other countries have passed similar legislation.
In short, the EITI complements these other efforts:
There are four key ways in which the EITI differs from these complementary efforts to improve revenue transparency:
The costs of EITI implementation in each country vary widely, depending on the complexity of the extractive industries, the scope of the reporting exercise, and the amount of related capacity building and communications activities. EITI implementation does not need to be a heavy financial burden and proportionality should be considered in deciding the scope of the process at the national level. Care should be taken to ensure that the scope of the EITI is reasonable in light of the total revenues from the sector.
The EITI process is led by the government, and all implementing countries provide financial means for the implementation of the national EITI work plan. Technical and financial assistance is available from a number of bilateral and multilateral donors, for example, the Extractive Global Programmatic Support (EGPS) Multi-Donor Trust Fund managed by the World Bank. The International Secretariat does not provide direct financial support, but it can provide advice regarding accessing technical and financial assistance.
Since 2017, implementing countries are required to make a financial contribution of USD 10,000 to the International Management (the Secretariat and the Board) of the EITI to help cover some of the support that they get from the international body. See the related Board decision.
Countries implementing the EITI Standard publish annual reports covering how the sector is governed from how licences are allocated, who owns them, the legal, fiscal and contractual framework, production, state-ownership, payments to governments, and allocation of the revenue. On payments, companies report payments to government (taxes, royalties, etc.) and the government reports what it has received. An Independent Administrator reconciles these figures.
A country is assessed against the standard in a process called Validation within 2.5 years of becoming a member. The Validation of a country against the Standard can yield the following results: Satisfactory progress, meaningful progress, inadequate progress and no progress. They reflect the degree of how each requirement is met and if the broader objectives have been fulfilled. See more here.
As well as assessing the progress against the requirements, Validation also seeks to assess the impact of the process on the sector and make wider recommendations on governance.
Learn more about Validation here.
A country implementing the EITI can be suspended for many reasons - both political and technical. For example, the relations necessary for EITI implementation might temporarily not exist after political upheaval. Or the country may have failed to meet a reporting deadline. A country can also be suspended if it is found to have made inadequate progress against meeting the requirements.
As sovereign states, countries can of course choose whether or not to implement the EITI. However, once implementation begins, the country is required to comply with the EITI Requirements. To do this, all companies and government agencies making or receiving payments must participate. The EITI leads to full disclosure within implementing countries. EITI implementation is mandated by law in a number of countries, including Liberia, Nigeria and Norway.
Most countries rich in oil, gas, and minerals have not done as well as they should have from their resources. Many have suffered from poor governance, under-performed economically and had a higher incidence of conflict. These effects are not inevitable and it is hoped that by encouraging greater transparency in countries rich in these resources, some of the potential negative impacts can be mitigated.
Benefits for implementing countries include an improved investment climate by providing a clear signal to investors and international financial institutions that the government is committed to greater transparency. For a relatively low cost, EITI also assists in strengthening licensing, record keeping and tax collection systems, and legal and fiscal frameworks. The EITI national platforms for accountability improve reforms and governance, as well as promoting greater economic and political stability. This, in turn, can contribute to the prevention of conflict based around the oil, mining and gas sectors.
Benefits to companies and investors include mitigating political and reputational risks as well as creating a level playing field in countries of operation. Political instability caused by opaque governance is a clear threat to investments. In extractive industries, where investments are capital-intensive and dependent on long-term stability to generate returns, reducing such instability is beneficial for business. Transparency of payments made to a government can also help to demonstrate the contribution that their investment makes to a country.
Benefits to civil society come from increasing the amount of information in the public domain about those revenues that governments manage on behalf of citizens, thereby making governments more accountable.
Countries implement the EITI for a wide variety of reasons. It is therefore unsurprising that the impacts have also been varied. Please see our news items, blogs and the EITI Progress Report for examples and our page on impact around methodology.