The Board found on 17 June 2019 that Mali had made overall meaningful progress in implementing the Standard, with considearble improvements across individual requirements. In this second Validation, the EITI International Secretariat assessed the progress made in addressing the ten corrective actions established by the EITI Board following the first Validation. See more under background below.
Timeline of Validation and related materials
In February 2018, the EITI Board agreed that Albania has made meaningful progress in implementing the 2016 EITI Standard. See Board decision on the first Validation 2018-11/BM-39/BP-39-5-A
In the second Validation, the EITI International Secretariat has assessed the progress made in addressing the ten corrective actions established by the EITI Board following the first Validation. See more under background below. Board decision 2019-44/BM-43 can be found here
Timeline of Validation and related materials
On 27 February 2019, the Board agreed that Norway has made satisfactory progress in implementing the EITI Standard. See Board decision
Timeline of Validation and related materials: 4 December 2018: Second Validation commenced.1 February 2019: Draft assessment was sent to stakeholders [English].Stakeholder Comments & Validation Committee Review7 February 2019:
On 8 May 2019, Germany was found to have made satisfactory overall progress in implementing the EITI Standard. See Board decision 2019-39/BC-273
Timeline of Validation and related materials
1 November 2018: Validation commenced19-23 November 2018: Country visit
Initial data collection and stakeholder consultations
21 December 2018 - Report on Initial data collection and stakeholder consultation [English
On 29 June 2018, the EITI Board agreed that São Tomé and Príncipe has made meaningful progress with improvements. See Board decision 2018-36/BM-40/BP-40-6-E
In this second Validation, the EITI International Secretariat has assessed the progress made in addressing the ten corrective actions established by the EITI Board following STP’s first Validation in 2016. See more under background below.
Timeline of Validation and related materials
On 1 October 2018, Seychelles was found to have made meaningful progress in implementing the EITI Standard. See Board decision 2018-49/BC-257
Timeline of Validation and related materials:
1 January 2018: Validation commenced5-9 February 2018: Country visit
Initial data collection and stakeholder consultations
9 July 2018 - Report on Initial data collection and stakeholder consultation [English
On 27 February 2019, Mauritania was found to hav emeaningful progress overall with implementing the EITI Standard, with considerable improvements across several individual requirements. See Board decision 2019-19/BM-42
Timeline of Validation and related materials
8 September 2018: Second Validation commenced.
6 December 2018: International Secretariat sends the draft assessment was sent to the Multi-Stakeholder Group (MSG) [
On 27 February 2019 the Board agreed that Ghana has made meaningful progress overall with implementing the EITI Standard, with considerable improvements across several individual requirements. See Board decision 2019-16/BM-42
Timeline of Validation and related materials:
8 September 2018: Second Validation commenced.
9 January 2019: International Secretariat sends the draft assessment was sent to the Multi-Stakeholder Group (MSG) [
The Board found on 17 June 2019 that Peru had made overall meaningful progress in implementing the Standard, with considerable improvements across individual requirements. See Board decision 2019-45/BM-43
Timeline of Validation and related materials
1 July 2018: Second Validation commenced.4 January 2019: International Secretariat sends the draft assessment to the Multi-Stakeholder Group (MSG) [English Spanish
On 27 February 2019, Nigeria was found to have made satisfactory progress in implementing the EITI Standard. See Board decision 2019-20/BM-42
Timeline of Validation and related materials:
11 July 2018: Second Validation commenced.3 October 2018: The International Secretariat sent the draft assessment was sent to the National Stakeholders Working Group (NSWG) [English
MSG comments & Validation Committee review
