EITI Board oversight of EITI implementation

Section 1 of Part 2 of the 2023 EITI Standard

This section outlines the procedures and criteria that the EITI Board uses in overseeing and assessing EITI implementation. These include the timeframes for implementing countries to publish data through the EITI, as well as EITI Board oversight of the Validation process.

Note: This document presents the current procedures for EITI Board oversight under the 2023 EITI Standard. For assessments conducted under the 2019 EITI Standard, please refer to the 2019 version of this document. 

Should the multi-stakeholder group conclude that it faces exceptional circumstances that necessitate deviation from the EITI Requirements, it must seek prior EITI Board approval for adapted implementation. The request must be endorsed by the multi-stakeholder group and reflected in the work plan. The request should explain the rationale for the adapted implementation.

The EITI Board will only consider allowing adapted implementation in exceptional circumstances. When considering such requests, the EITI Board will prioritise the need for comparable treatment between countries and ensuring that the EITI Principles are upheld, including ensuring that the EITI process is sufficiently inclusive, and that EITI disclosures are comprehensive, reliable and will contribute to public debate.

Implementing countries are expected to publish timely information (Requirement 4.8). Implementing countries are required to publish the requested information (typically through an EITI Report) within 18 months of being admitted as an EITI implementing country. Thereafter, the published data must be no older than the second to last complete accounting period (e.g. information pertaining to the financial year ending 31 December 2023 must be published at the latest by 31 December 2025).

If the data is not published by the required deadline, the country will be suspended. The suspension will be lifted if the EITI Board is satisfied that the outstanding data is published within six months of the deadline. If the outstanding data is not published within six months of the deadline, the suspension will remain in force until the EITI Board is satisfied that the country has published EITI data in accordance with Requirement 4.8. If the suspension is in effect for more than one year, the EITI Board will delist the country.

When the EITI Board admits a new implementing country, it will establish a deadline for the commencement of Validation within two and a half years. Subsequent to considering the findings, the EITI Board will establish a deadline for further Validations (Article 5).

1. Assessment of each EITI Requirement

The Validation process will assess the country’s progress in addressing each of the EITI Requirements. Detailed guidance on the types of evidence that are required in order to make an assessment on individual requirements is set out in the Validation Guide. Progress in meeting each EITI Requirement will be assessed using the following scale and will be assigned corresponding points:

• Leading score (100 points): All aspects of the requirement, including “expected” and  “encouraged” aspects, have been implemented, and the broader objective of the requirement has been fulfilled through systematic disclosures in government and company systems.
• Very good score (90 points): All required aspects of the requirement have been addressed, and the broader objective of the requirement has been fulfilled.
• Good score (70 points): Significant aspects of the requirement have been implemented (minor technical gaps remain), and the broader objective of the requirement is mostly fulfilled.
• Good score with improvements (80 points): In order for the EITI Board to conclude that a country has a good score with improvements, the country needs to demonstrate that it has made progress since the previous Validation where the EITI Requirement achieved a ‘good score’.
• Limited score (50 points): Significant aspects of the requirement have been implemented to a limited extent, and the broader objective of the requirement is partly fulfilled.
• Limited score with improvements (60 points): In order for the EITI Board to conclude that a country has a limited score with improvements, the country needs to demonstrate that it has made progress since the previous Validation where the EITI Requirement achieved a “limited score”.
• Poor score (25 points): Significant aspects of the requirement have not been implemented, and the broader objective of the requirement is not fulfilled.
• Poor score with improvements (35 points): In order for the EITI Board to conclude that a country has a poor score with improvements, the country needs to demonstrate that it has made progress since the previous Validation where the EITI Requirement achieved a “poor score”.
• Very poor score (0 points): No aspects of the requirement have been implemented, and the broader objective of the requirement is not fulfilled. 

2. Assessment of effectiveness and sustainability

A country may be awarded in total up to three additional points for the effectiveness and sustainability of EITI implementation which will be added to the overall score.

This is measured by the following six indicators:

• Anti-corruption
• Revenue mobilisation
• Energy transition
• Inclusive governance (including gender)
• Data access and use (including efforts on systematic disclosures)
• Monitoring and learning (including EITI-related changes to extractive industry policy and practice)

Validation will consider the overall effort of the country towards strategic priorities without assigning individual scores to each indicator. Detailed guidance on the types of evidence that are required in order to make an assessment on the effectiveness and sustainability indicators is set out in the Validation guide.

If a country is assessed as “poor” (25) or “very poor” (0) on any of the requirements relating to stakeholder engagement (Requirements 1.1, 1.2 and 1.3), the EITI Board will suspend the country in accordance with Article 8.

If a score on any of the requirements related to stakeholder engagement is “limited” (50), the EITI Board will formulate time-bound corrective actions. The Board will suspend the country if it fails to demonstrate progress on these requirements within a period set by the Board in the corrective action.

The EITI Board will establish a date for the commencement of the country’s next Validation. The outcomes of Validation will determine the date of a country’s subsequent Validations, as follows:

• Leading: Countries with an overall performance of “leading” are revalidated after 48-60 months.
• Very good: Countries with an overall performance of “very Good” are revalidated after 48-60 months.
• Good: Countries with an overall performance of “good” are revalidated after 36-48 months.
• Limited: Countries with an overall performance of “limited” are revalidated after 24-48 months.
• Poor: A country with an overall assessment of “poor” in Validation is temporarily suspended. The suspension is lifted once the country has improved its overall score above “poor”. Countries with an overall score of “poor” are validated within 24-36 months.
• Very poor: A country with an overall assessment of “very poor” in Validation is temporarily suspended. The suspension is lifted once the country has improved its overall score above “poor.” Countries with an overall score of “very poor” are validated within 24-36 months.

For requirements that are assessed as “poor” and “very poor”, there will be a mid-term monitoring that will take stock of progress of countries towards meeting these requirements.  For countries that are assessed with an overall score of ‘limited’ and below, the mid-term monitoring will also cover a streamlined assessment of progress of requirements that have been assessed as “limited” in Validation.

The considerations for setting the period for Validation within a specific range will be reflected in the Validation guide.

An implementing country may request an extension of this timeframe in accordance with Article 7. A country may also request to commence Validation earlier than scheduled by the EITI Board.

Stakeholders who are concerned that the level of implementation has significantly deteriorated may also request the EITI Board for an early Validation or a targeted review under Article 8. The EITI Board will review the situation and exercise its discretion on whether to mandate an early Validation of one or several components.

Implementing countries are expected to improve their component and overall scores between Validations. If a country has not improved its score on at least one of the three components, or there has been material deterioration in any of the components, the EITI Board may temporarily suspend the country until it demonstrates progress. If the country repeatedly fails to make progress, it will be delisted.

The EITI Board will take into account the following factors when determining whether to suspend or delist an implementing country:

• The overall numerical score and component scores. Countries with a “leading” or “very good” performance on all components will generally not be suspended for failure to demonstrate progress since the previous Validation;
• The advice and recommendations of the Validation team and the Validation Committee;
• The nature of the requirements that have not been implemented and how close the requirements are to being met;
• The magnitude and complexity of the extractive sector of the country;
• Other barriers to meeting requirements such as, but not limited to, state fragility and recent or ongoing political change, and the extent to which the multi-stakeholder group has undertaken actions to resolve barriers encountered;
• The good faith efforts undertaken by the multi-stakeholder group to comply with the requirements;
• The reasons and justifications for not complying with the requirements; and
• Any plans agreed by the multi-stakeholder group to address the requirements in the future.

An implementing country may apply for an extension if it is unable to meet any of the deadlines specified above. The EITI Board will apply the following tests in assessing any extension requests:

1. The request must be made in advance of the deadline and be endorsed by the multi-stakeholder group.
2. The multi-stakeholder group must demonstrate that it has been making continuous progress towards meeting the deadline and has been delayed due to exceptional circumstances. In assessing continuous progress, the EITI Board will consider:
   1. The EITI process, in particular the functioning of the multi-stakeholder group and clear, strong commitment from government.
   2. The status and quality of EITI reporting, including meaningful progress in meeting the requirements for timely reporting as per Requirement 4.8 and efforts to address recommendations for improving EITI reporting.
3. The exceptional circumstance(s) must be explained in the request from the multi-stakeholder group. These may relate to, for example, exceptional political instability.

1. Suspension due to breaches of the EITI Principles and EITI Requirements

Where it is manifestly clear that a significant aspect of the EITI Principles and EITI Requirements are not adhered to by an implementing country, the EITI Board will suspend or delist the country. Where the EITI Board is concerned that adherence to the EITI Principles and EITI Requirements is compromised, it may task the EITI International Secretariat with gathering information about the situation and submitting a report to the EITI Board.

Suspension of an implementing country is a temporary mechanism. The EITI Board shall set a time limit for the implementing country to address breaches of the EITI Standard. During the period of suspension, the country will have the status “suspended”. If the matter is resolved to the satisfaction of the EITI Board by the deadline, the country’s status and level of progress will be reinstated. If the matter has not been resolved to the satisfaction of the EITI Board by the deadline, the EITI Board will delist the country.

2. Suspension due to political instability or conflict

The EITI Board may decide to suspend countries in cases where political instability or conflict manifestly prevents the country from adhering to a significant aspect of the EITI Principles and EITI Requirements. Countries that are experiencing exceptional political instability or conflict may also voluntarily apply to be suspended. In this situation, the government should submit an application for voluntary suspension with the EITI Board. The government’s application should note the views of the multi-stakeholder group.

The EITI Board will monitor and review the situation on a regular basis and retains the right to extend the suspension period or delist the country.

3. Lifting the suspension

The government may apply to have the suspension lifted at any time. The application should document the steps agreed by stakeholders to restart EITI implementation and the Validation process, and the work plan to achieve adherence to the EITI Requirements. If the EITI Board is satisfied that the reasons for suspension have been addressed, the suspension will be lifted. Upon lifting a suspension, the EITI Board will consider setting new reporting and Validation deadlines as appropriate. At all stages in the process, the EITI Board shall ensure its concerns and decisions are clearly communicated to the implementing country.

Delisting involves revoking a country’s status as an EITI implementing country. Delisting will occur if:

1. An implementing country has been subject to suspension and the matter has not been resolved to the satisfaction of the EITI Board by the agreed deadline; or
2. The EITI Board concludes that a country has repeatedly failed to demonstrate progress in Validation.

Where it is manifestly clear that a significant aspect of the EITI Principles and EITI Requirements are not adhered to by an implementing country, the EITI Board reserves the right to delist the country. A delisted country may reapply for admission as an EITI implementing country at any time. The EITI Board will apply the agreed procedures with respect to assessing EITI candidature applications. It will also assess previous experience in EITI implementation, including previous barriers to effective implementation, and the implementation of corrective measures.

An implementing country may petition the EITI Board to review its decision regarding suspension, delisting or the outcome of Validation. In responding to such petitions, the EITI Board will consider the facts of the case, the need to preserve the integrity of the EITI, and the principle of consistent treatment between countries. The EITI Board’s decision is final. The country concerned may, prior to the notice periods under the Articles of Association (Article 7), appeal a decision of the EITI Board to the next ordinary Members’ Meeting.